Timeline for When should we allow questions about products that don't belong to a SharePoint SKU?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2014 at 8:27 | comment | added | Stu Pegg | @NathanDeWitt: It's fine with SharePoint - although low votes rates and low return rates are usually indicators of poor community health. The issue is that spreading the expert community thinner by supporting 3rd party software will not help matters. | |
| Jan 24, 2014 at 17:39 | comment | added | Nathan DeWitt | @StuartPegg This site is perfectly capable of handling the broad scope that is SharePoint. | |
| Jan 21, 2014 at 21:42 | comment | added | Stu Pegg | @NathanDeWitt: To be frank, the thing this site needs least is to increase its scope. SharePoint is an extremely broad subject as it is. | |
| Jan 21, 2014 at 14:19 | comment | added | Nathan DeWitt | This is not true. Many questions will be answerable by others who have used the tool. The example in the OP was "how do I send email to the initiator of a Nintex workflow" or something like that. Anyone who has successfully implemented Nintex within SharePoint would be able to answer this question. The community support is still broad. | |
| Dec 19, 2012 at 11:19 | comment | added | user13635 | what if i want feedback from an independent community on a site controlled by the community rather than on a site owned and modded by the provider? | |
| May 18, 2011 at 13:35 | comment | added | Stu Pegg | @PirateEric: With no-one except the creators knowing whether any workarounds or completely different methods have been used to reproduce that functionality... | |
| May 18, 2011 at 12:07 | comment | added | Eric Alexander | I don't agree, some 3rd party tools that run on to of Sharepoint give users the ability to do things like you would in code, like web service calls in Nintex. | |
| May 18, 2011 at 0:05 | vote | accept | Alex AngasMod | ||
| May 22, 2011 at 4:50 | |||||
| May 17, 2011 at 17:36 | comment | added | Stu Pegg | @ccomet: Thanks from doing a better job of rummaging than me. :) It was indeed the Subsonic reference I was thinking of. | |
| May 17, 2011 at 17:17 | comment | added | Grace Note StaffMod | Perhaps you refer to this question and answer? Some other questions include this and this, with others just echoing the first one mostly. | |
| May 16, 2011 at 18:01 | history | answered | Stu Pegg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |