Timeline for Mutually exclusive tags
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2012 at 14:52 | vote | accept | Stu Pegg | ||
| Aug 9, 2012 at 14:52 | comment | added | Stu Pegg | There's also a precedent for deleting edition tags: meta.sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/297/… | |
| Aug 9, 2012 at 8:41 | comment | added | SPDoctor Mod | Yup, there is an element of looking for an easy tag, rather than thinking about the subject and tagging accordingly. Getting content owners to add metadata is a problem, as we SharePoint people know well. | |
| Aug 8, 2012 at 20:54 | comment | added | Stu Pegg | I think there are instances where they're useful, but they're usually being misused as replacements for "sharepoint". The problems they cause seem to outweigh the benefit they bring, much like the version tags. | |
| Aug 8, 2012 at 18:48 | comment | added | Kit Menke Mod | Also, I'm killing spapi | |
| Aug 8, 2012 at 17:45 | comment | added | Kit Menke Mod | I'd vote for Foundation & Enterprise to be deleted. Also anything with both versions specified... just remove both version tags. | |
| Aug 8, 2012 at 14:10 | history | answered | SPDoctorMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |