I was reviewing a question that has a bounty tied to to it. A couple people made valid points, but the author answers his own question. My issue with this is, the author states the issue was with a workflow action which is part of a codeplex project, not native SharePoint workflow actions which the other answers were assuming.
Is this something that should be closed? The initial question seemed valid, but the response and answer leads me to believe it's violating the third party stipulations or could be deemed too narrow.
Post in reference. Thoughts?