4

I just noticed this question that seems a dupe.

Access Denied Add-SPSolution

(original: Sharepoint 2010 powershell add-spsolution access denied)

I have voted it as so, but one more thing caught my eye: one of the answers in the dupe is the exact copy of an answer in the original question (see here). How we should treat this? actually the copied answer provided a source... but I still believe that it should at least be reworded. Also to consider that if the 'copy-poster' founded the answer in another question on the same site, it probably would be better to mark the question as a dupe.

I am wondering what the common opinion is when working out such cases.

  • 1
    I appreciate your flag, and will compare questions later on. But I think we should keep all answers, even if they answer was made before the edit. Thanks! – Benny Skogberg Dec 10 '13 at 12:00
  • 1
    @BennySkogberg - actually the problem is that the old question asked how to add a solution, the new one is about adding an SPShellAdmin. I was thinking about reversing the edit and then creating a new question for the new info (while keeping the old one closed as a dupe). Right now a reader would just find out how to add a solution while looking for something else. – SPArchaeologist Dec 10 '13 at 12:14
  • @SPArceologist Sound like a plan. Reverse and keep as dupe. I'll do that when I'm not on iPhone! – Benny Skogberg Dec 10 '13 at 14:22
2

In my opinion, I think it should be marked as duped, and if the question is in fact a little different, the link to the source answer is used first, maybe as a comment. Taking someone else's work as an answer from external links are fine as long as you source them, but I think that taking someone else's work from stack exchange degrades and steals the possible reputation and credit, even though it's sourced. It's one of those legal loopholes that I think should be frowned upon.

  • 1
    I agree that this is a loop hole, in many cases much harder to spot than this time too. What we can do, is to flag it as a duplicate. And if we feel the need to, make a commenting the duplicate answer about it and (more aggressive approach) down vote the duplicate answer. Down voting seems a bit hard here though, since there is a link to the source at least :) – Robert Lindgren Dec 9 '13 at 18:26
  • 1
    I agree. I'm not one to down-vote, usually. Making the answer useful is the sole purpose of stack exchange, so if the person the asks the question is answered, with a successful solution, I think that is value. – Mike Dec 9 '13 at 20:53
  • 2
    @RobertLindgren - I agree about the downvote. Anyway, I would also have preferred if instead of copying the answer in two places, the question was marked as a duplicate in the first place. – SPArchaeologist Dec 10 '13 at 8:03
0

Actions taken:

  • Rolled back the question
  • Locked the question for editing (24 hours)
  • Blockquoted the answer
  • Source changed to accepted answer instead of original question
  • Locked the answer (24 hours)

Final desicion has not yet been made, stay tuned

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .