7
votes
Accepted
Old pre 2013 PeoplePicker and the new ClientPeoplePicker: do they require different tagging?
I think they should, 2010/2007/2003 (can't recall) use a different type of field, even though they are the same field. I'd say create a tag, ClientPeoplePicker with a description that it is 2013/2016 ...
- 43.3k
5
votes
Accepted
Edits which change the scope of the original question getting approved
I really appreciate your concern here moe. If you have the reputation, the only thing you can do is to edit the question back and remove the tag. I wish there's a way to see who approved the edits and ...
- 12.2k
5
votes
Edits which change the scope of the original question getting approved
I too really appreciate the question and suggestions by @Moe and @Mike.
I have reviewed more than 300 edits till now, I always reject those edits which are just not required or does not make post ...
- 8,481
4
votes
Edits which change the scope of the original question getting approved
I agree with Mike on the following, as it seems like the only action we currently are able to do:
the only thing you can do is to edit the question back and remove the tag
Recently I've done some ...
- 5,267
4
votes
Why (new) people (to SharePoint SE) tag the questions with multiple [sharepoint-*] -tags? How to avoid that?
This has some legacy to it, and I don't see them as wrong, for several reasons.
The sharepoint-enterprise, has its counterpart in both sharepoint-foundation and sharepoint-standard. In the old 2010-...
- 25.5k
3
votes
Accepted
"Nintex" tag? Really?
It is off topic, It seeming always pops back up because people keep asking questions. We close them off topic, they eventually expire and the tag goes away, only to pop back up again because someone ...
- 43.3k
Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible